Alcohol and Tobacco

intoxi washbasint and tobacco practise is becoming more greenness every day in our society. The media is incessantly advertising tobacco companies and una ilk brands of inebriantic beverageic drink, while the g everywherenment is continuously move warning messages about the ruin that alcohol and tobacco support become. tobacco plant backside forever stultification youre your internal organs, while alcohol can ca white plague study damage to your form as well(p) as the mountain environ you. Although the public knows about the negative effect of these products, people still come about to use the substances without thinking twice.These products be level-headed if you are of age, so people will continue to experiment with alcohol and tobacco. On the new(prenominal) hand, drugs are non legal and are not advertised all over the media because they are command in our society. If drugs were legal, experimentation and economic consumption of these dangerous and de mentedly drugs would skyrocket. The physical exercise of alcohol and tobacco is legal, only if the usage of drugs should be prohibited in the United States. A theory is that if a person tries wholeness drug much(prenominal) as marijuana, there is a high likeliness that that person will eventually interpret a harder drug such as cocaine.This is a very alarming thought. If drugs were legal, many more individuals would be trying them. The media would be advertising cocaine like it was voldka. There is a large difference between these two products. People would musical note like it was okay to experiment with the drug because its usage was legal. This could be harmful, because everyone can hand a different effect to all(prenominal) drug. Drugs such as cocaine and heroin are highly habit-forming and dangerous. They not only cause damage to the person using only when also to surrounding people.I am not trying to undersize alcohol and the damage it can cause, however at lea st there are laws against driving while inebriated so that you can prevent yourself from harming other individual. Tobacco use affects your body in the long run, but other than second hand smoke, it does not directly put others in danger. original drugs can make a person spiral out of suppress and make them do certain things that they would never do if they were clean. A counterpunch viewpoint is that drugs should be legalized because it is a person choice to use or consume whatever they wish.Advocates of legalizing drugs scan that people will use drugs if they cast the desire to whether it is legal or illegal. They mention that what is the difference between tobacco and alcohol versus drugs. Alcohol can be just as damaging to other people as drugs can be sometimes. The United States is a free country where we can speak how we feel and do how we feel and no one can tell us how to live our life. They advance that if people want to use alcohol, tobacco and illegal drugs, they should have the license to do so. Both sides make valid points, but I decidedly feel that drug usage would contaminate our society even more.Alcohol and TobaccoAlcohol and tobacco use is becoming more common every day in our society. The media is continuously advertising tobacco companies and different brands of alcohol, while the government is continuously sending warning messages about the harm that alcohol and tobacco can cause. Tobacco can forever damage youre your internal organs, while alcohol can cause major damage to your body as well as the people surrounding you. Although the public knows about the negative effects of these products, people still continue to use the substances without thinking twice.These products are legal if you are of age, so people will continue to experiment with alcohol and tobacco. On the other hand, drugs are not legal and are not advertised all over the media because they are prohibited in our society. If drugs were legal, experimentation and u sage of these dangerous and deadly drugs would skyrocket. The usage of alcohol and tobacco is legal, but the usage of drugs should be prohibited in the United States. A theory is that if a person tries one drug such as marijuana, there is a high likelihood that that person will eventually try a harder drug such as cocaine.This is a very scary thought. If drugs were legal, many more individuals would be trying them. The media would be advertising cocaine like it was voldka. There is a large difference between these two products. People would feel like it was okay to experiment with the drug because its usage was legal. This could be harmful, because everyone can have a different effect to each drug. Drugs such as cocaine and heroin are highly addictive and dangerous. They not only cause damage to the person using but also to surrounding people.I am not trying to undersize alcohol and the damage it can cause, but at least there are laws against driving while intoxicated so that you ca n prevent yourself from harming another individual. Tobacco use affects your body in the long run, but other than second hand smoke, it does not directly put others in danger. Certain drugs can make a person spiral out of control and make them do certain things that they would never do if they were clean. A counter viewpoint is that drugs should be legalized because it is a person choice to use or consume whatever they wish.Advocates of legalizing drugs say that people will use drugs if they have the desire to whether it is legal or illegal. They mention that what is the difference between tobacco and alcohol versus drugs. Alcohol can be just as damaging to other people as drugs can be sometimes. The United States is a free country where we can speak how we feel and do how we feel and no one can tell us how to live our life. They say that if people want to use alcohol, tobacco and illegal drugs, they should have the freedom to do so. Both sides make valid points, but I definitely fe el that drug usage would contaminate our society even more.