Rh Bill & Malthusian Theory Essay

In 2011, we pick out now seven metreion flock living(a) in this planet. Unfortunately, Earths estimated carrying capacity is only about eleven to twelve consignion people. With such a big worry we be facing straighta direction, it is important to analyze and examine what the scholars of the past have to say of our increase population. atomic reckon 53 of the famous population theorists of that time is doubting Thomas Malthus. In 1798, Malthus proposes his own theory about population. According to him, human populations arrive exp championntially while food production grows at an arithmetic rate. Thus, if the ontogeny in our population is not controlled properly, then the number of the people would join on faster than the food supply. He state that if this growth rate is allowed to continue, it would assume to a food shortage. To solve this problem, he proposed three solutions. The first one is positive check. This method increases death rates due to wars, famines, dis ease, and natural disasters. enlistment or negative check is the other one. It lowers the birth rate which is concluded through abortion, birth control, and celibacy. The last one is moral restraint which is refraining from sum until the time when a person is capable of supporting a family. This deuce hundred-year-old theory is now happening these days. It predicted the problems of food shortage that the world is experiencing today beca function of the uncontrolled increase in population. Still, I cannot fully agree with Malthus be motility on that point are things that he forgot to take into consideration when he formulated this theory. peerless is the ability of man to increase the food production as stated by Marx. He failed to recognize mans ability to handling science and technology to solve these population problems like the possible developments in agricultural technology which can increases the supply of food.Maybe during that time, science is qualification a slow pro gress that he assume we cannot remedy these problems. other one is the use of birth control as a way of reducing population. He believed that having only few kids is the only way to abandon or control the increasing growth rate. Moreover, he confused the go for for knowledgeable relationships with the desire to have infantren. He didnt realize that a person can even engage in a internal relationship and still dont have a child with the help of contraceptives. Although Malthus theory has some loopholes, the essentials of the theory have not insofar been demolished. There are some self-reliances that turned out to be uncoiled.RH billThe reproductive health bill which is now a justness is the most controversial bill in the Philippines for decades which date back to 1967. The bill is composed of topics which deal with issues about family planning, maternal and child health, and reproductive and sexual conditions. Its main objective is to lift the reproductive standards of Fil ipinos by promoting respect for life, advised choice, birth spacing and responsible parenthood which is accordance with the human rights standards. It withal guarantees access to medically-safe, legal and quality reproductive health care operate and relevant information.Although it has promising merits, I do not support the bill because of some of its faulty assumptions. One is the assumption that overpopulation is the cause of poverty. In truth, in that respect is really no relationship between overpopulation and poverty but RH bill still insists that it is the cause of the worsening poverty in our country. It is true that it is one of the factors but it is never the root cause of poverty. What is the primary cause of poverty are the corruption and the bad governance of the administration. In fact, we are one of the most corrupt countries in Southeast Asia.Another assumption is that Philippines is overpopulated. In reality, there is no overpopulation in our country. It is true that our cities are thick populated but in some parts of our country, there are small numbers of people and some are still uninhabited.One more problem in the bill is the belief that contraceptives will hinder abortion and sexually transmitted diseases. We should not entrust our safety to the use of these contraceptives in the prevention of STDs because according to some studies, there is no proofread that condoms, for example, is effective in preventing STDs. In the case of abortions, it did not really lessen the incidents. According to a study in Spain, a 10-year period of an increasing use of contraceptive devises had been paralleled by a significantly increasing number of abortions.Though it is already a law, I hope that it can still be corrected so that it can truly uplift the standards of living of the Filipino people and be the solution to lessen the countrys underemployment and booming population.